When to call
The audit planning meeting is on the calendar.
We go through last year’s findings and this year’s request list with you first, so you know which requests will be hard and what you want to say about scope.
The board asked what controls sit under the AI policy.
A policy on paper and a tested control are different things. We inventory the AI in use, build the controls COSO’s February 2026 guidance describes, and test them, so the audit committee hears about AI the way it hears about every other control.
The examiner asked what replaced the CAT.
The FFIEC retired its Cybersecurity Assessment Tool on 31 August 2025. We baseline you to NIST CSF 2.0, with a crosswalk from the old maturity statements, written so the examiner can read it.
A deficiency letter arrived.
From the auditor or from an examiner. We write the remediation plan and the memo the audit committee reads, design a compensating control your team runs while the fix is built, and tell you plainly whether the fix can run long enough to be tested before it is tested again.
A state put a date on your AI.
Texas and Illinois since 1 January 2026, Colorado and California from 1 January 2027. One control test answers all four, and we run it before the date, not after the first complaint.
The bank crossed one billion dollars of assets.
Since 1 January 2026 the FDICIA annual audit and audit committee requirements start at one billion dollars of assets, and management’s internal control assertion at five billion. We set the program up before the first year it applies.
An IPO date is set.
A material weakness found before the offering is disclosed in the registration statement and in the quarterly certifications that follow it, and management’s first assessment of internal control is due with the second annual report after the offering. We find the control gaps, in the business processes and in IT, while there is time to fix them.
The biennial plan is due in June.
Texas state agencies, public universities and junior colleges file an information security plan with the Department of Information Resources by 1 June of every even numbered year. We assess the controls against TAC 202 and the Texas Cybersecurity Framework well before it is due, so the plan describes controls that work.
The person who ran compliance left.
A fractional lead keeps the calendar, the evidence requests and the relationship with the auditor or the examiner running while you hire, or instead of hiring.
The control count keeps growing and nobody can say why.
Three hundred key controls in Optro or Workiva, half of them duplicates or orphans. We rationalize the population, fix the risk statements and the mapping, and set the platform up so the audit committee view comes out of the system.